Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Interview with Anna & Dave, Editors of PodCastle

Today's interview is with editors Anna Schwind and Dave Thompson, editors of PodCastle. PodCastle is a wonderful fantasy fiction podcast and a pro-paying market accepting both reprint and original submissions. Check out their full submission guidelines.

From their website:
PodCastle is the world’s first fantasy audio magazine. Each week we bring you short stories across the spectrum of fantasy from leading authors and new discoveries. Like our sister podcasts, Escape Pod and Pseudopod, PodCastle is entirely free to listen and share.


W1S1: What attracts you to the fantasy genre in general and PodCastle's offerings in specific?

Dave: Fantasy, more than most genres, seems to have very broad boundaries. One of the things we try to do at PodCastle is make it so you don't know what kind of story you're going to get week after week. It could be something very contemporary and literary - like Kelly Link's The Hortlak, which is about convenience clerks servicing zombies, at a border that may or may not be death - or something like Tim Pratt's Little Gods, which is a beautiful story about grief and mourning - or something like Lavie Tidhar's Buried Eyes, which is a very twisted Guns and Sorcery western. Hopefully, the one thing the stories all have in common is that they're fantastic, in more than one sense of the word.

Anna: I think we tend to be drawn to stories about experiences not like our own, and settings not our own, and people not like us that nonetheless resonate on some level. I'm a tourist reader, and the fantasy genre tends toward depictions and characters and story arcs that are very satisfying jaunts to other places, such as Cat Valente's "Urchins While Swimming" (Episode 198) or E. Lily Yu's "Tiger in the BSE" (Episode 243).

W1S1: Are there things in a submission you look for specifically for a podcast that you might not look for in a print publication?

Dave: Well, we like to find things we haven't seen before. It's great to run a bit of S&S or Urban Fantasy or something that's like comfort food for us fantasy fans, but when we find something that's in a setting we haven't seen before, or a structure we haven't seen, it's appealing. We recently ran a story by Cat Rambo and Ben Burgis that was set in the time of the Mariel Boatlift in Florida and Cuba in the 80s, and that felt like a very fresh setting. We're still looking for Cold War stories. We just bought a story that I think will be a bit challenging for some of our audience because of its very unique structure. And when I first started reading it, I didn't think it could work well in audio. But a couple paragraphs in, I could already hear the voice of it in my head, and we knew it would work despite that.

Anna: There are definitely things that do not work in audio. We're sad when someone sends us an otherwise great story that there's no way to do in audio. Stories with visual puns are hard to pull off, for example, and we see a number of those. But best are stories that surprise us, that we think might not work in audio, but if we're creative enough, or get the right narrator to read it, end up working out beautifully.

W1S1: How would you describe the submissions for PodCastle? Are there trends that seem to be the major causes of rejection?

Dave: We like the worldbuilding to be thought out and explored. Not always explained, but if it feels like the world the story is in will fall over if we poke it, that's a deal breaker. Settings we've seen a million times - a story set in a generic European fantasyland can get a strike against it very fast. Lack of sensory detail is a pet peeve.

Anna: People sometimes forget that we're mostly a reprint market. Sending us something that's not extraordinary yet good will be rejected if it's an original but that same story might be bought as a reprint. It's a little headscratching for us, because we assume authors want to be paid, and if they get their story printed somewhere else first, they'll be paid twice for their efforts! If the story is great, something that really speaks to us and we really love, it makes no difference whatsoever...we do run a handful of originals every year as well as a handful of stories that we solicit (as opposed to being subbed to us). But there's fifty two slots in a year and not every one of those is a story that completely blew us away and an author's chances are much better if their story has been bought before.

W1S1: What do you like best about editing for PodCastle?

Dave: Finding the right voice for a story is definitely my favorite part. Reading a story, and trying to figure out which of our awesome narrators is perfect for it. And then, knowing that I can listen to that story over and over again.

Anna: I do poorly on "like best" questions generally, but a couple of things I enjoy about editing PodCastle are working as a partner with Dave and when people tell us that they have difficulty reading stories in text but are able to enjoy them in audio - either because they lack time to read, or have a disability, or are too young yet to be independent readers. Being able to bring stories to people who would not otherwise have access to them is really rewarding for me.



A huge thanks to Dave and Anna for joining us! For those of us looking for fantasy audio markets, PodCastle should be at the top of our list.

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Week #19 Check-In

Week #19 of 2013 is behind us.

How's it been for you? Did you Sing the Body Electric, or was it more like A Memory of Murder? Here's your chance to tell everybody about it, whether you're a weekly or monthly (or anything in between) W1S1 participant.

If you've managed to write a story or poem and submit it, comment today and let everyone cheer! If something you've written as part of W1S1, whether this year or in previous years, has been accepted, let us know so your name can be added to the Write1Sub1 Hall of Champions. And if stuff has gotten in the way of your writing or you're starting to feel like a rejection magnet, let us know, so we can commiserate. We're all in this together.

And don't forget to let us know when your W1S1 creations are published so they can be mentioned in the weekly Satummary. Be sure to note if they're paid publications ($) so they can be added to the Published Work$ page. Publications qualify for this page as long as they were written during any year's W1S1 participation, whether they pay pro rates or help you pay for morning coffee.

Successes and failures, triumphs and disasters, brilliant ideas and insane dreams: we want to read all about them.

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Satummary #18

This week in W1S1:

Alex Shvartsman's "Explaining Cthulu to Grandma" was published Orson Scott Card's Intergalactic Medicine Show..


Beth Cato's story "Clementine, Who Swims with Mermaids" was the featured story at Penumbra.

Folly Blaine's prize-winning micro "Before the Fireworks" was published at Flash Fiction Chronicles.

Michelle Ann King's flash "Destiny Fell in Love" appeared at Every Day Fiction.

Milo James Fowler's fifth installment of his serial novel, The Backtracker was published at JukePop Serials.

Congratulations fellow W1S1 peeps. Please take some time to read our members' stories, and be sure to comment where that is possible (if you like the story, of course). Our weekly check-in post will appear here tomorrow.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Interview with Shawn Garrett, Editor of Pseudopod

Welcome to our first interview of audio month here at W1S1! This week I'm talking with Shawn Garrett, the editor of Pseudopod. Shawn gives us some great advice about submitting to Pseudopod, as well as podcasts and the horror genre in general.

From the Pseudopod website:
Pseudopod is the premier horror podcast magazine. Every week we bring you chilling short stories from some of today’s best horror authors, in convenient audio format for your computer or MP3 player.
Without further ado, on with the interview!



W1S1: What attracts you to the horror genre in general and Pseudopod's offerings in specific?

I read many genres as a youngster but found that I gravitated towards Horror/Weird/Supernatural as it had the strongest effect on me. I like that "horror" is something of a meta-genre in that almost any kind of story can become a horror story depending on the focus/intent of the author and what they choose to emphasize and I also like that horror as a genre encompasses so many approaches and styles: it can be quiet or loud, subtle or brash, highly emotional or coldly unfeeling, progressive or reactionary, realistic or fantastic.

With Pseudopod, my intent is to showcase as wide a variety of horror as is possible - I have my tastes just like anyone, and there are things I'm not fond of, but my general rule is that the story be "horror" - which as I've said can mean many things (and to many people) but to me means that the story's specific intent is to scare or disturb, regardless of whatever else it is trying to do, and that the author know that and direct or control their writing towards those ends.

W1S1: Are there things in a submission you look for specifically for a podcast that you might not look for in a print publication?

Yes - none of these is engraved in stone and we do violate these suggestions from time to time BUT people "listen" to fiction in a different way than they "read" fiction (a short example - the listener can't dawdle over a sentence and re-read it or consider it in depth - unless they want to stop or reverse the recording) so there are some general considerations we do look at (as I said, though, not set in stone):

plot driven stories work best in audio - too much description or flowery language, or something that's an overall mood piece, or even just dense, literary writing, may be harder for the listener to "track"

first person narration is a plus (or, if not first person, try to keep the number of important characters down to 3-4 tops - again, too many characters are hard to "track")

our word limit is almost totally sacrosanct - we pride ourselves on delivering a weekly story that runs no longer than 40 odd minutes at the most (many episodes are considerably less) - one way to think of it is this - our imagined standard listener is a commuter who wants to listen to something on their way home or to work and be able to finish it in that sitting.

In general if your story is told in a specific, distinctive voice, this is good, but if it's told in a specific distinctive voice/accent that is obscure or hard for us to fill (for example it *has* to be read in English with an Innuit accent and all Innuit words must be pronounced exactly for the desired effect) than there's a good chance we may pass.

Also, please keep in mind that Pseudopod *reads fiction*, we do not produce audio dramas and so we're not looking for audioplays or stories with sound effects, etc. Sometimes, if a story suggests some sound production, this may be attempted, but this is a decision made by the editors.

Also, please keep in mind that we, as a rule, do not have authors read their own work.

W1S1: How would you describe the submissions for Pseudopod? Are there trends that seem to be the major causes of rejection?

Well, there are cliches of the genre (that are too broad and long-lasting to be called "trends") and then there are faddish trends. On the one hand, I actually enjoy standard horror types and tropes and don't need *constant invention* to entertain me, but generally if we see something with a vampire or werewolf, it should either be approaching the topic from a very different direction than we're used to, or be written so well and focused on some generally underused aspect that I don't mind that it's basically a "vampire"/etc. story.

Standard cliches we get lots and lots of: "Narrator is the ghost/dead" and the related "Hunter is the Hunted" in which a monster or madman is unsuspectingly the prey of the "innocent victim". In general, I'd warn most young writers, and writers in general, away from the ironic surprise or riddle story unless you have a simply amazing one and are an accomplished enough writer to pull it off (or if it's written as a flash, which we're more forgiving of), simply because people are a lot more savvy nowadays and constantly on the lookout for hints. Not a big fan of "oh woe is me", long-suffering vampires (or soap-opera vampire clans) or sexy/young tween monsters or fights monsters. Also, serial killers/slashers are a hard sell to me. Also, please no fan fic or fan fic in disguise.

Current trends - zombies/zombie apocalypse (sorry, but now that seemingly everyone has imbibed Romero's basic zombie symbolism, everyone seems to think they can place a new spin on it without realizing that hundreds if not thousands of others are trying the same thing. We have podcast zombie stories on Pseudopod but generally they are singular takes on a specific approach and, once done, won't be repeated), apocalypse in general (a little more open to these but apocalypse stories have a tendency to just assume the horror of the situation and end up not aggressively emphasizing the horror as the point of the story, instead focusing on social commentary, etc.), lazy Bizarro (sorry, but an overly florid and "crazy" description of your lone acid trip where you ended up having sex with Super Mario is not "horror" - please go read some classic Surrealist/Dada or Absurdist fiction and figure out how to use those elements in a story - it may not be easy!) and, yes, Lovecraft pastiches (please realize that just because you've recently discovered Lovecraft does not mean that people haven't been discovering him for decades - many great writers like Ramsey Campbell and Thomas Ligotti grew their love of Lovecraft into their own distinct voices and styles. We can and do publish stories on Pseudopod that touch on Lovecraft but please try to make your Lovecraft story an exploration of his tone, themes or larger ideas and not a checklist of his creature and book names). I can also say that I'm not a big fan of "urban fantasy" or "paranormal romance" - the latter just seems to me to be romance writing with Dark Fantasy trappings (which is fine, but not horror) and the former seems to me more of an outgrowth of Dark Fantasy with a modern setting and "monsters" who serve the purpose of video game opponents. I'm not very hot on horror comedy.

In general, I'd say listen to any random, recent 4 episodes of Pseudopod (thus, a month's worth) to get an idea what we're buying.

W1S1: What do you like best about editing for PseudoPod?

I love the variety of stories that get submitted and I love being able to present new, established and classic authors to a wide audience and being able to present said variety of authors juxtaposed with each other. I love reading a submission and discovering a writer with a strong control of their material, strong style and voice and story conception. I love reading straight-up scary horror-comic-book yarns, subtle psychological or emotional explorations and thoughtful social commentary all presented in the horror story form.

W1S1: Do you have a wishlist for submissions you'd like to see more of? Or fresh ideas/themes you're drawn to?

We're open to podcast horror-noir or horror-crime stories and we don't get many of those (again, though, they must emphasize the "horror" - human or supernatural - and not just be tough guy mysteries) and we also have a penchant for grim and grisly survival tales (Men's adventure, like ARGOSY magazine used to publish, but with a dark edge - think Jack London). I would like to have more monster stories on Pseudopod but a good monster story (by my definition) is hard to write. I very much enjoy stories where the source of the weird is treated as something awful, unknown and unknowable, and marvelous and not looked at through a jaded, ironic, deconstructed or blase lens. I also very much prefer stories that grow out of normal human situations (think Matheson's "Duel") and feature settings of the real world as lived in ("write what you know") - I'm more likely to engage with a story set in a tenement district, hard-scrabble small-town or general suburbia than a fantasy setting or the realms of the super rich- and have hooks in real human emotion (but no too maudlin, please). I do like the occasional shot of over the top violence, gore or blasphemy but they generally have to be extremely well-written and conceived to get me to buy them.

In a sense, there's nothing we won't look at, as long as it's horror (and my assistant editors' teeth are grinding now, I'm sure) but please send us your A-game material. In general, we do try to give some critique to all rejections, so expect feedback even under the worst of circumstances.



A big thank you to Shawn for joining us and happy submitting to all the W1S1 participants!

Sunday, May 5, 2013

Week #18 Check-In

Week #18 of 2013 is over and done!

How's it been for you? Was it The Best of All Possible Worlds, or would do you need A Medicine for Melancholy? Here's your chance to tell everybody about it, whether you're a weekly or monthly (or anything in between) W1S1 participant.

If you've managed to write a story or poem and submit it, comment today and let everyone cheer! If something you've written as part of W1S1, whether this year or in previous years, has been accepted, let us know so your name can be added to the Write1Sub1 Hall of Champions. And if stuff has gotten in the way of your writing or you're starting to feel like a rejection magnet, let us know, so we can commiserate. We're all in this together.

And don't forget to let us know when your W1S1 creations are published so they can be mentioned in the weekly Satummary. Be sure to note if they're paid publications ($) so they can be added to the Published Work$ page. Publications qualify for this page as long as they were written during any year's W1S1 participation, whether they pay pro rates or help you pay for morning coffee.

Successes and failures, triumphs and disasters, brilliant ideas and insane dreams: we want to read all about them.